Another characteristic is the agreement in participations that have different forms for the sexes: languages cannot have conventional agreement at all, as in Japanese or Malay; barely one, as in English; a small amount, as in spoken French; a moderate amount, such as in Greek or Latin; or a large quantity, as in Swahili. The agreement is the act of the agreement. This is an archaism rarely applied correctly today. Also keep in mind the agreement that has been shown to be also in the subjunctive mind. Spoken French always distinguishes the plural from the second person and the plural from the first person in the formal language and from the rest of the contemporary form in all the verbs of the first conjugation (infinitive in -il) except Tout. The plural first-person form and the pronoun (us) are now replaced by the pronoun (literally: «one») and a third person of singular verb in modern French. So we work (formally) on Work. In most of the verbs of other conjugations, each person in the plural can be distinguished between them and singular forms, again, if one uses the traditional plural of the first person. The other endings that appear in written French (i.e. all singular endings and also the third plural person of the Other as the Infinitifs in-er) are often pronounced in the same way, except in the contexts of liaison. Irregular verbs such as being, fair, all and holdings have more pronounced contractual forms than normal verbs. Britannica.com: Encyclopedia Article on agreement This agreement is also found with adjectives predicate: man is great («man is great») vs.

the chair is large («the chair is great»). (In some languages, such as German. B, that is not the case; only the attribute modifiers show the agreement.) A rare type of arrangement that phonologically copies parts of the head instead of agreeing with a grammatical category. [4] For example, in Bainouk: For example, in standard English, you can say I am where it is, but not «I am» or «it is.» This is because the grammar of the language requires that the verb and its subject coincide personally. The pronouns I and him are respectively the first and third person, just as the verbs are and are. The verbage form must be chosen in such a way as to have the same person as the subject, unlike the fictitious agreement based on meaning. [2] [3] In American English, for example, the expression of the United Nations is treated as singular for the purposes of concordance, although it is formally plural. The very irregular verb is the only verb with more coherence than this one in the contemporary form. In Hungarian, verbs have a polypersonal concordance, which means that they correspond to more than one of the arguments of the verb: not only its subject, but also its object (accusative). There is a difference between the case where a particular object is present and the case where the object is indeterminate or if there is no object at all.